Gore Death

mattchuck2 said:
Like I said, in the grand scheme of things, who cares? Nothing like a 6 day internet argument where nothing is decided.

What better is there to do? It's not like we could be skiing in some fantastic new powder or anything :-)

<snipped>

mattchuck2 said:
I was especially mindful when people mentioned that it can happen to any skier at any time on any trail. THAT is why I cautioned that it can be taken too far. I then used hyperbole to drive home the point by saying I imagined people in those sumo body suits.

I would disagree here. There have been times when I've lost an edge and had to recover ... what if I didn't recover? While that might happen more often on easier trails where I might be more aggressive than harder trails where I might be more careful, it certainly crosses my mind that I could slip and get seriously hurt. I do think it can happen to any time on any trail. But I agree with you that that alone isn't reasoning to place a fence in any given place. The fact that it may happen a lot at one spot on one particular trail might be.

<snipped>

mattchuck2 said:
Anyway, I think we agree with each other more than we disagree with each other . . . perhaps we should find the common ground we can all agree on:

1. There is a dangerous section of Lies that has caused severe injury and even death
2. There is a case for a fence in that location
3. There is a case against a fence in that location
4. Just because they put a fence there does not mean the whole mountain will have to be covered in fences
5. People should be held personally responsible for decisions that they make
6. When conditions are icy, people should use extra caution, even on trails that they know very well

Yes, I agree with all of that. Points 2-4 are especially the points I was trying to make.
 
mattchuck2 said:
Oh, and the Yankees Suck! ;-)

We can agree to disagree on the fence thing, but now ... Seriously, though, it wouldn't be as much fun as a Yankees fan if there weren't fans of the losing teams too :-) (And no, I'm not a front runner. I started following the Yankees in the late 1980s around the beginning of elementary school, and have been avidly following them since to a point of obsession.) Are you a Sox fan? Mets?
 
mattchuck2 said:
Mets . . . here's to another subway series . . . hopefully it turns out differently

Another subway series ... with the same outcome ... would be great :-) Though getting to the WS would be fun in itself. It's been so long :-)
 
Hey, the Mets will give the Yankees a run for their money as THE New York team if Beltran comes around and Delgado performs as advertised.......and Pedro's foot isn't a problem......and they have a closer worth a darn.......and..........ok, Met's fan shutting up now.
 
As a Boston fan Im content for my lifetime, its not going to get better than what happened in 04.

I think that the fences shouldnt be put up. Anyone can lose an edge at anytime, the only person or thing that should be held responsible is the person themself.
 
As for fences, I agree they shouldn't have to be there......but that doesn't always mean it doesn't make sense to put them in. It be a very litigious society we live in.

I agree with all the sentiments about skier responsibility and such, but the ORDA doesn't have Vail type pockets to defend all the warnings about who's responsibility is whose. Given that, I can see where a good argument can be made to erect a fence in an isolated area that, for whatever reason, poses above average risk.....even if I don't personally agree with the fence being there.

All it takes is one lawyer to string together a couple of fatalities at the same spot to at least raise reasonable doubt that reasonable action was taken to prevent a fatality, regardless of the warings and inherent risks.

Of course you can put up the fence and then the skier who would have crushed his chest sliding into a tree breaks his neck sliding into the fence, and then what do you do.............just another good argument for no fence.
 
Son of Drifter said:
mattchuck2 said:
Not to be a dick, but maybe people who aren't experts shouldn't be skiing it.

I assume you've been to Gore before. Why would you take your friends on the trail if it was beyond their ability? And don't tell me that they are actually good skiers, they just made a mistake. I've skied that trail hundreds of times and I've never even come close to the area you are talking about. If you know the mountain, you are just as responsible as your friends for their injuries.

Too late for that. How do you know that the guy that died wasn't an expert skier? Expert skiers don't get hurt? Stuff happens. That guy could have been a great skier but just got a little careless and hit an icy path that maybe he didn't notice until it was too late. Don't assume things. When you assume you make an ass out of you and me. :twisted:

I couldn't agree more. Mattchuck, dude: you're taking this "personal responsibility" thing waaay too far. How about some "responsibilty" from the mountain to protect its PAYING CUSTOMERS from an area that management is ON CLEAR NOTICE is dangerous? Particularly when the suggestion here to ameliorate that danger is so simple and inexpensive. Does the mountain have ANY responsibilty to its customers after it collects the cost of the ticket? C'mon, be real. People who go skiing are definitely assuming a risk and surely don't have a right to expect to be held completely harmless when they assume that risk. But I think they can justifiably expect that the mountain will have taken all reasonable afforts to protect them from known dangers; the key words here being "reasonable" and "known". That's just common sense.

"Responsibilty" flows both ways - doesn't it? My suggestion: Lighten' up on the insurance industry kool-aid. That shit's bad for ya'.
 
Willy,

I gotta say, I'm not some republican crackjob who tells bums to get a f'-in job and rips public money from poor single mothers, but I do feel as though this is one case where a little personal responsibility is in order. You know what you're getting into when you ski Lies: a steep trail that, more often than not, is icy and demands that you ski at an expert level.

It's just a personal opinion. I don't speak for the mountain and I don't really care what the mountain does. I do, however see a lot of people on that trail that probably shouldn't be on there. I'd hope that if these people fall and hurt themselves they don't try to blame the mountain for their injuries, but rather, they see the error in their ways and make a mental note to pay attention to signage and to ski trails within their ability level.

The best thing Gore has done is let Lies bump up since the accident. Everyone on that trail is now controlling their speed, and I've seen people hiking from the top of the headwall back towards Cloud because they looked down and thought that they might not be up to the challenge.

I recognize that lots of people ski a groomed steep trail and assume that they can ski it well, but that's where Lies is dangerous. There's a double fall line, and there are spots on the trail that have caused severe injury and death.

At this point, I don't care if they put a fence there. I just hope it doesn't encourage even more reckless behavior on a trail that is every bit as hard as Rumor.
 
Death at Gore....lots of mis information

I've been around the ski industry as a skier and a person employed at a few different resorts. The death of a guest at a ski area is incredibly hard to deal with for everyone. The family and friends as well as the resort employees go through all sorts of tough times. A lot of what I have read in this forum is based on rumors and non truths. First, this is the only skier or rider fatality ever on Lies. There was a skier fatality 2 years ago on another black diamond trail at Gore, but it wasn't Lies, it was Uncas. Thats a verifiable fact Secondly, Lies is a double black diamond trail and should be skied or snowboarded by experts only. The problem with the fence idea is a major liability issue for a resort. The best way to think of this, is to look at every chairlift or gondola tower at a resort where there is a trail going by it. Each tower has been padded. A while ago in the industry resorts started padding just those towers that represented true problem areas that someone could hit. Our sue happy friends took advantage of this and sued several resorts around the US because ALL towers weren't padded, and if one had to be than they all had to be... Can you see where this goes...if you decide that one trail needs a fence on the side (mind you this isn't at an intersection being used to control access at a merge or anything), then who is to say that one isn't needed somewhere else, and pretty soon, since all trees are hard, we would be forced to fence everything. It's not far fetched, and the tower padding is a prime example of it. The fact is our legal system makes it harder to mark real hazards without also having to mark every possible spot someone could get hurt on a mountain. Its a true dilema for a resort.

The comments about the skiers ability are not relevant. Michael Fitzgibbons, the gentlemen who died at Gore was a passholder who skied there often. He had good skills and certainly was experienced on Lies. He recently retired as a Swim Coach and Phs Ed teacher and was in shape to be skiing up there. It was, by all accounts just a bad accident.

The person who stated that Lies has had lots of accidents is speaking without true knowledge unless he is a Gore patroller with access to accident reports. The mountains maintain very good records of what accidents they have had, where they have occurred and the level of injury. According to Gore officials I spoke to, Lies has not had more accidents of any level than any other trail on the mountain, and far less than most.

Lastly...since I'm on a role here. For those folks that think helmets are the answer, please do some research as there are many studies showing that helmets do not protect skiers/riders in accidents above 12-15mph. This is fairly slow and anyone over intermediate level skis faster than that routinely.

OK...really lastly.... as for deaths in skiing, take a look at some of the sporting goods studies on fatailities in sports. Skiing ranks far below activities like Bicycling, Swimming, etc. There are statistically only about .75 deaths per million skier visits, compared to 19 per million for bicycling and 44 per million for Swimming. These are sporting good industry estimates, not the ski industries.

The most important thing to make skiing and riding safer is to teach some basic etiquette and the rules of the road. People are buzzing each other, cutting them off, not letting someone know they are passing them, starting up from the side of a trail in front of an approaching skier/rider... we need to change that to make this sport safer.

whew....
 
Re: Death at Gore....lots of mis information

adkman656 said:
I've been around the ski industry as a skier and a person employed at a few different resorts. The death of a guest at a ski area is incredibly hard to deal with for everyone. The family and friends as well as the resort employees go through all sorts of tough times. A lot of what I have read in this forum is based on rumors and non truths. First, this is the only skier or rider fatality ever on Lies. There was a skier fatality 2 years ago on another black diamond trail at Gore, but it wasn't Lies, it was Uncas. Thats a verifiable fact Secondly, Lies is a double black diamond trail and should be skied or snowboarded by experts only. The problem with the fence idea is a major liability issue for a resort. The best way to think of this, is to look at every chairlift or gondola tower at a resort where there is a trail going by it. Each tower has been padded. A while ago in the industry resorts started padding just those towers that represented true problem areas that someone could hit. Our sue happy friends took advantage of this and sued several resorts around the US because ALL towers weren't padded, and if one had to be than they all had to be... Can you see where this goes...if you decide that one trail needs a fence on the side (mind you this isn't at an intersection being used to control access at a merge or anything), then who is to say that one isn't needed somewhere else, and pretty soon, since all trees are hard, we would be forced to fence everything. It's not far fetched, and the tower padding is a prime example of it. The fact is our legal system makes it harder to mark real hazards without also having to mark every possible spot someone could get hurt on a mountain. Its a true dilema for a resort.

The comments about the skiers ability are not relevant. Michael Fitzgibbons, the gentlemen who died at Gore was a passholder who skied there often. He had good skills and certainly was experienced on Lies. He recently retired as a Swim Coach and Phs Ed teacher and was in shape to be skiing up there. It was, by all accounts just a bad accident.

The person who stated that Lies has had lots of accidents is speaking without true knowledge unless he is a Gore patroller with access to accident reports. The mountains maintain very good records of what accidents they have had, where they have occurred and the level of injury. According to Gore officials I spoke to, Lies has not had more accidents of any level than any other trail on the mountain, and far less than most.

Lastly...since I'm on a role here. For those folks that think helmets are the answer, please do some research as there are many studies showing that helmets do not protect skiers/riders in accidents above 12-15mph. This is fairly slow and anyone over intermediate level skis faster than that routinely.

OK...really lastly.... as for deaths in skiing, take a look at some of the sporting goods studies on fatailities in sports. Skiing ranks far below activities like Bicycling, Swimming, etc. There are statistically only about .75 deaths per million skier visits, compared to 19 per million for bicycling and 44 per million for Swimming. These are sporting good industry estimates, not the ski industries.

The most important thing to make skiing and riding safer is to teach some basic etiquette and the rules of the road. People are buzzing each other, cutting them off, not letting someone know they are passing them, starting up from the side of a trail in front of an approaching skier/rider... we need to change that to make this sport safer.

whew....

ADKman. Thank you for the best post I have seen on this forum.
 
Back
Top