mattchuck2 said:Like I said, in the grand scheme of things, who cares? Nothing like a 6 day internet argument where nothing is decided.
What better is there to do? It's not like we could be skiing in some fantastic new powder or anything
<snipped>
mattchuck2 said:I was especially mindful when people mentioned that it can happen to any skier at any time on any trail. THAT is why I cautioned that it can be taken too far. I then used hyperbole to drive home the point by saying I imagined people in those sumo body suits.
I would disagree here. There have been times when I've lost an edge and had to recover ... what if I didn't recover? While that might happen more often on easier trails where I might be more aggressive than harder trails where I might be more careful, it certainly crosses my mind that I could slip and get seriously hurt. I do think it can happen to any time on any trail. But I agree with you that that alone isn't reasoning to place a fence in any given place. The fact that it may happen a lot at one spot on one particular trail might be.
<snipped>
mattchuck2 said:Anyway, I think we agree with each other more than we disagree with each other . . . perhaps we should find the common ground we can all agree on:
1. There is a dangerous section of Lies that has caused severe injury and even death
2. There is a case for a fence in that location
3. There is a case against a fence in that location
4. Just because they put a fence there does not mean the whole mountain will have to be covered in fences
5. People should be held personally responsible for decisions that they make
6. When conditions are icy, people should use extra caution, even on trails that they know very well
Yes, I agree with all of that. Points 2-4 are especially the points I was trying to make.