mattchuck2
New member
(post deleted)
Scary???? I'm not sure I understand this post ...mattchuck2 said:My wife mentioned today that, without counting the Slides (which won't be open at all this spring, judging by the condition of them now), there isn't any terrain that is really scary at Whiteface. I agreed.
Gore's got skier's left Rumor Headwall, some stuff in some glades (especially some off the map stuff), and she mentioned Lower Steilhang headwall (which I don't find particularly tough), but at least that's a few things on the mountain that give you pause. Whiteface is weird like that. Everything is right out there for you, and what you see is what you get. I guess Empire would be the trail to point to, but I never had any problem skiing that before . . . Even the Glades at Whiteface are easier than Gore.
The only thing about Whiteface that I find tough is the ice and other skiers. Anyone else?
Face4Me said:I still don't get your post ... was there really a point, or were you just trying provoke some reactions?
mattchuck2 said:My wife mentioned today that, without counting the Slides (which won't be open at all this spring, judging by the condition of them now), there isn't any terrain that is really scary at Whiteface. I agreed.
Gore's got skier's left Rumor Headwall, some stuff in some glades (especially some off the map stuff), and she mentioned Lower Steilhang headwall (which I don't find particularly tough), but at least that's a few things on the mountain that give you pause. Whiteface is weird like that. Everything is right out there for you, and what you see is what you get. I guess Empire would be the trail to point to, but I never had any problem skiing that before . . . Even the Glades at Whiteface are easier than Gore.
The only thing about Whiteface that I find tough is the ice and other skiers. Anyone else?
SKIdds said:While my experience with Gore is limited compared to Whiteface, I did find Gore's terrain, overall, to be more challenging. It has WF matched for steeps. It has more and better glades. It allows much more terrain to become bumped up. A lot more rocky, quirky terrain for jumps, and launches, and airs. I wouldn't argue with him there. I would argue whether or not there is anything scary at either mountain, for an advanced skier. Nothing at either mountain is pucker you @ss steep, no fall zone, 'what they heck am I doing here?' kind of terrain, at least on the trail map. Hit the Slides, go off map at Gore....things get more interesting.
mattchuck2 said:tjf67 said:From the post it is obvious you do not know your way around the hill. If I went to gore and did not know where I am going I would be bored after 6 runs. Its just a matter of knowing hwere to go. Sat. the best option was to leave the hill and get out in the backcountry. WHich I am guessing would have been the best thing to do down at gore as well.
Haha . . . This past Saturday? The best option was to go in the backcountry?!?!?!? You must be joking, right?
I think there's arguments to be had as to which mountain is "harder". The best answer (IMO) is that the mountains cater to a different skiing style. Whiteface to more of the racer, knife sharp edger; the snowboarder; and to the Park skier (some of the kids in the Big Air contest on Sunday were SICK). And Gore to the bump skier (although I wish there was more), tree skier, and hippy telemarker. This is not to say that there isn't some overlap (great racer style at Gore and great tree skiers - and especially great bumpers - at Whiteface), but just generally.
And yeah, "skier's left of Rumor" is a weak example, but where is the spot at Whiteface that you'll look at and pause a second before you dive in? I still haven't heard an answer . . . I was looking for SOMETHING this past weekend, and I couldn't find it. I agree that Gore probably wasn't much better this past weekend, but I wasn't asking the question about Gore, I was asking about Whiteface.
Face4Me said:were you just trying provoke some reactions?
Yes. But I still want to know the answer. Where is your spot?
mattchuck2 said:tjf67 said:From the post it is obvious you do not know your way around the hill. If I went to gore and did not know where I am going I would be bored after 6 runs. Its just a matter of knowing hwere to go. Sat. the best option was to leave the hill and get out in the backcountry. WHich I am guessing would have been the best thing to do down at gore as well.
Haha . . . This past Saturday? The best option was to go in the backcountry?!?!?!? You must be joking, right?
I think there's arguments to be had as to which mountain is "harder". The best answer (IMO) is that the mountains cater to a different skiing style. Whiteface to more of the racer, knife sharp edger; the snowboarder; and to the Park skier (some of the kids in the Big Air contest on Sunday were SICK). And Gore to the bump skier (although I wish there was more), tree skier, and hippy telemarker. This is not to say that there isn't some overlap (great racer style at Gore and great tree skiers - and especially great bumpers - at Whiteface), but just generally.
And yeah, "skier's left of Rumor" is a weak example, but where is the spot at Whiteface that you'll look at and pause a second before you dive in? I still haven't heard an answer . . . I was looking for SOMETHING this past weekend, and I couldn't find it. I agree that Gore probably wasn't much better this past weekend, but I wasn't asking the question about Gore, I was asking about Whiteface.
Face4Me said:were you just trying provoke some reactions?
Yes. But I still want to know the answer. Where is your spot?
mattchuck2 said:... where is the spot at Whiteface that you'll look at and pause a second before you dive in?
...
Where is your spot?
We're talking a difference in degree of difficulty that is really splitting hairs. They both have difficult terrain, and Matt's observation about catering to different styles is true. Personally, I think Gore can claim to have slightly tougher terrain because glades, bumps and ledgy lift lines are generally harder to ski than groomed trails, regardless of how steep they are. What cranks Whitefaces difficulty is the sheer length of the steep sustained vertical. That will beat you up in a hurry. They are both tough mountains to ski, but for different reasons. Just my opinion, and there is nothing wrong with differing opinions.Jack the Ripper said:SKIdds said:While my experience with Gore is limited compared to Whiteface, I did find Gore's terrain, overall, to be more challenging. It has WF matched for steeps. It has more and better glades. It allows much more terrain to become bumped up. A lot more rocky, quirky terrain for jumps, and launches, and airs. I wouldn't argue with him there. I would argue whether or not there is anything scary at either mountain, for an advanced skier. Nothing at either mountain is pucker you @ss steep, no fall zone, 'what they heck am I doing here?' kind of terrain, at least on the trail map. Hit the Slides, go off map at Gore....things get more interesting.
I'm not buying that Gore is harder than Whiteface. I've skied both and I'll gladly admit gore has better glades but that's all it's got over Whiteface. It's not a harder mountain to ski/ride. No way.
Denison said:mattchuck2 said:... where is the spot at Whiteface that you'll look at and pause a second before you dive in?
...
Where is your spot?
Nobody mentioned Blazer's Bluff. That one scary drop off.
As for ice, I do not care much for it, but I'd be scared to take my wife and kid and find the place icy as you reported.